In New Letter, Clinton's Lawyers Demand ABC Yank Film | TPMCafe

In New Letter, Clinton's Lawyers Demand ABC Yank Film | TPMCafe: "On September 9, 2006 - 6:07pm grayeagle said:

Regardless of what folks believe or don't believe about what is presented by the 'Path to 9/11,' all the public has to realize are these facts about what happended on President Clinton's watch:

-The World Trade Center was bombed; little was done and terrorism as a cause was ignored by the Clinton Administration.

-The Khobbar Towers were blown up killing many US service personnel; little was done and terrorism as a cause was ignored by the Clinton Administration.

-The USS Cole was attacked and numerous sailors were killed; little was done and terrorism as a cause was ignored by the Clinton Administration.

-Two US embassies in Afirca were blown up and hundreds of both US citizens and Africans were killed; little was done and terrorism as a cause was ignored by the Clinton Administration.

-On three occasions, Osama bin Laden could have been captured but 'other' considerations were cited by the Clinton Administration as preventing his capture by this country.

-And then, less than 9 months after President Bush took office, this country lost over 3000 of its citizens because of a 'legal' wall that was set up by the Clinton Administration that prevented the CIA and the FBI from exchinging information -- information in this case that would have exposed Atta and his gang to arrest (read: no 9/11!)

Let's face it, the Clinton Administration dropped the ball 'big time' on the problem of terrorism, and we and the world are now paying the price -- and if fact, most likely immeresed in World War III. Whether the Clinton Administration people that are 'quoted' in this movie actually said what the movie depcits them as saying, please consider those 'quotes' in the context of what actually happened in the world.

Finally, most of the comments posted have compared this movie to Michael Moore's, citing freedom of speech as the 'bottom line.' I have to agree because if government officials or ex-government officials are successful in influencing or causing changes to the contents of a movie (any movie), then what area of 'free speech' will be next. ABC needs to stand their ground!
login or register to post comments | link |
Not yet rated.
On September 9, 2006 - 6:05pm iszlq said:

Hello.... yoo hoo....

FIRST AMENDMENT

ring a bell?"